amd fx 8370 userbenchmark

But note that the older AMD FX-8350 scored practically the same (well within the margin of error), and the 95-watt AMD FX-8370E wasn't far behind. Let's start with the FX-8370E. Categories. For typical users however, the FX-8370 runs at 4.0/4.3 GHz (base/turbo) and typically hits 5.0 GHz when overclocked. But especially given the higher TDP of the FX-8370 and FX-8350, you may want to use a self-contained liquid cooler, as we did in our testing, to make sure the chips run at optimal speed when maxing out the cores for more than several minutes at a time (say, when crunching videos or rendering 3D images). Uses much more power than comparable Intel chips, which also have on-chip graphics. en. Find out how your PC compares with the AMD FX-8370 with 3DMark, the Gamer's Benchmark. 4 options from $275.00 . AMD Black Edition AMD FX 8370 / 4 GHz processor overview and full product specs on CNET. It taxes all available processor cores and threads while rendering a complex image. It was the best you could do without jumping to the new-and-pricey X99 platform, spearheaded by the company's eight-core monster processor, the Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition. But—our theory, anyway—when you're taxing all cores at maximum over an extended period, the thermal headroom narrows, keeping the chip's variable clock speed from ramping up quite as far for a sustained period. Here, the AMD FX-8370 looked quite good versus the Intel-based competition. Each CPU has been tested for stability at the listed overclocked speeds. The hubbub around these chips centered mainly on the AMD FX-9590, and AMD's claims concerning its raw clock speed. Turbo Boost will be disabled on all processors to make a fair comparison without skewing results. Get it from Steam. AMD's FX-8370 desktop CPU bumps up its top clock speed a tick, offering slightly better performance than the now-aging FX-8350 in some instances. Given that the FX-8370 is built around the same architecture of the FX-8350, and both chips share the same 4GHz base clock speed, we weren't expecting much in the way of performance surprises. Core i7 875K. Introducing The AMD FX-8370E. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/amd-fx-8370. For those looking for maximum performance within a not-outrageous power envelope, though, it's the third one, the 125-watt AMD FX-8370 (no "E") that will be the most interesting of the lot. The consumer CPU market has changed a bit since then. Those chips—and indeed, all of Intel's current line of mainstream "Haswell" and last-gen "Ivy Bridge" CPUs—have the added advantage, like AMD's A Series APUs, of integrated, on-chip graphics. A nyolcmagos processzort fejlett, 32 nanométeres gyártási technológiával készítik, amelynek köszönhetően sikerült javítani a feldolgozás hatékonyságát, sikerült a teljesítményt megnövelni és csökkenteni a hősugárzás mértékét is. For a quick and dirty start, I employed the BIOS save file I had for my FX-8350, which was a solid IBT-stable 4.7GHz clock speed save file. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Given the FX-8370's higher boost clock rate (100MHz over the FX-8350's), we expected this to be a test where the FX-8370 set itself apart from the FX-8350. Iar rezultatul este impresionant: 8.7 GHz, adica un spor de frecventa de 112%. To refresh, both Intel's and AMD's recent processors employ a turbo mode, called "Turbo Core" in AMD's case and "Turbo Boost" in Intel's. AMD FX-8370 - Benchmark and Specs compare with other CPU Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Intel's chips did much better here because, clock for clock, they excel in single-threaded tasks versus AMD's current-generation architectures. This test is perhaps where the FX-8370 looked best. 26 people found this helpful. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser. I also running 32 GB of Kingston 1866 (8GBx4… The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). Next up, in our Photoshop CS6 benchmark test, the AMD FX-8370 again lost out to its predecessor. At a basic level, both are the same thing: They enable the CPU cores to speed up a bit over the base clock rate when a task demands it and the heat-dissipation conditions allow (what the chip makers call the "thermal headroom"). So with a good air cooler or a self-contained liquid cooler and some patience, you should be able to get even better performance out of the FX-8370. It Depends on the App, Intel Optane SSD 900P Series (280GB) Review, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Founders Edition) Review. (The closest "easy overclockers" in Intel's line are the Ivy Bridge-based Core i5-3570K (on the LGA 1155 socket) at around $230, and the Haswell-based Core i5-4670K (LGA 1150), at around $240.) In the interim, we did see and cover the debut of some lesser FX chips, such as the AMD FX-4130 in early 2013, but the emphasis there was on lower price points. Keep an eye on your inbox! AMD FX 8370 4.0ghz/Turbo 4.3ghz Read more. This documented on the AMD nomeclature for AMD FX8300 series. It's designed to max out the CPU with a multi-threaded workload and show its pedal-to-the-metal potential. AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors. This test taxes only a single CPU core, as many older, staple programs do, thus exposing a weakness of AMD's current processor architecture. Christmas shopping discountsView deals. This chart compares the AMD FX-8370 with the most popular Processors over the last 30 days. Matt is a self-described Net nerd, gadget geek, and general connoisseur of off-kilter culture. AMD FX-8370 Piledriver je nejvhodnější do základních kancelářských počítačů nebo sestav pro opravdu nenáročné uživatele. Its effective speed is 83 which is currently only exceeded by AMD's 20% more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money. AMD FX-8370 Benchmarks Benchmark results for the AMD FX-8370 can be found below. (The other AMD FX chips here were tested using single-fan watercoolers with smaller, single-fan radiators: either an AMD stock watercooler from the early days of the FX-8000 series, or an Antec Kühler H20 620.) Your subscription has been confirmed. Intel Core i5 vs. i7, How Fast Is Apple's M1 Chip? AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition Visit the AMD Store. Shop By Price. Here, the FX-8370 managed to outpace the dual-core, quad-threaded Core i3 chip. Also note that the pricing above includes boxed air coolers for the FX-8000-series processors. AMD flaunted the CPU's 5GHz clock rate in turbo mode, a speed plateau it called a first among consumer CPUs. The display of third-party trademarks and trade names on this site does not necessarily indicate any affiliation or the endorsement of PCMag. This time, the FX-8370 bested its older sibling by a whisker. But those looking for a new chip from AMD that has power requirements more in line with comparable Intel chips will want to look to one of the two new 95-watt FX E-Series parts instead. Gift Guide. The system will receive a fully updated, fresh install of Windows 7 Professional 64-bit edition, in addition to the latest chipset drivers for each board and GeForce drivers for the NVIDIA GTX 770. Holiday Gift Guide 2020. Jerry Neutron 66,062 views. $369.86 . Backing down to 5.015GHz at 1.475v got the FX-8370 fully stable and gets the chip right in the 5GHz range for less coin than the FX-9590. We compared the AMD FX-8370 to a pair of AMD processors we're also currently reviewing (the lower-TDP AMD FX-8370E, the family-leader AMD FX-9590), as well as against its AMD FX-8350 forebear and the company's top APU at this writing, the A10-7850K. And one of its advantages over some comparable Intel chips is that it's unlocked for easy overclocking, while comparably priced Intel chips aren't. Michael Otero. smartphones smartwatches headphones tablets. On the other hand, those building a new PC from the ground up—CPU and mainboard together—and looking for the best performance overall, especially when it comes to lightly threaded workloads, will still be better off considering an Intel chip, such as the like-priced Core i5-4570 or the pricier Core i7-4790K, since the Haswell/LGA 1150 platform has more potential CPU-upgrade overhead. We're not entirely sure why, but Intel's QuickSync dedicated video conversion tech may have played a role on this test (and elsewhere), giving the Core chips an edge. With four Piledriver modules you thus get eight logical CPU cores. This kind of core-happy video conversion is where the AMD FX-8370 should shine. Home > Processors > AMD FX-8370 Review Last updated: UL Procyon. The FX-8370E, which is also priced at $199.99, is worth paying a little extra for if you care about lower cooling requirements and power draw, because of its lower 95-watt TDP. It's a decent option for those with an AMD AM3+ system to upgrade, but the FX-8350 remains, arguably, a better value. This real-world test, in which a short video file gets crunched down to a couple of file formats, maxes out all available cores, and so it often shows multi-core, multi-threaded processors in their best light…. And while chips like the Intel Core i7-4770K and the more recent Core i7-4790K haven't broken major new ground in terms of raw performance (ignoring their integrated graphics, for the moment), time has allowed Intel to widen its already strong performance lead. Boxed Processor And in one sense, it does, easily finishing the test faster than any Intel chip here, save for the $340 Core i7-4790K. Reasonably priced for an eight-core, 4GHz chip. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time. But again, it was only able to just keep pace with the FX-8350, a chip that's two years old and now costs $20 less. The FX-8370 got the same treatment, but I started with the 5.067GHz setup that I used to get the FX-9590 stable at over 5GHz, and the FX-8370 posted and ran benchmarks, just without any repeatable stability. It seems the break point for these two processors is right around the 5GHz mark, much like what I saw with the FX-9590 and FX-9370, even down to the voltages used to reach the final clock speeds. FX-8370 AMD $153 Bench 66%, 21,750 samples: 61x: GPU; GTX 1050-Ti Nvidia $155 Bench 31%, ... FX-8370, RTX 2070: Average: Battle cruiser - 66: 77: 54 72 89 74 - 52: $779: ... UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. The FX-8370 also couldn't outpace the $120 Core i3 chip here. The 2nd generation FX series processors have been built upon what you guys know as the Vishera architecture, all managed on the very same 32nm fabrication node. Here, the FX-8370 again ran essentially even with the FX-8350 and FX-8370E chips, and it wasn't all that much faster than the company's high-end APU, the A10-7850K, which sells for about $20 less and includes very good integrated graphics. GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs. Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning. As such, the day in day out setting for the FX-8370E is more along the lines of 4.99GHz using up to 1.5v. PCMag, PCMag.com and PC Magazine are among the federally registered trademarks of Ziff Davis, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. So while the AMD FX-8370 managed to best the 95-watt AMD FX-8370E, it lagged more than a minute behind the older (and now cheaper) FX-8350. AMD FX-8370 Review AMD FX-8370 review is temporarily unavailable. PART 1 - Core i5 3570k vs FX-8350 Gaming without AA Linus Tech Tips - Duration: 7:56. The base clock speed of 4GHz remains the same between the two chips. That'll make any chip, even the mighty $1,000 Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition, break a multi-threaded sweat. So, while the FX-8370 is still a decent value if you often run software that takes advantage of all available cores, for most users the $179.99 FX-8350 will be a better value, given the $20 price difference. We then switched over to our venerable iTunes Conversion Test, using version 10.6 of iTunes. PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. I've check your user benchmark and your ram speed is set at 800mhz even though it is a 1866Mhz type. Only minimally faster than FX-8350, which is $20 cheaper. (We've got that chip in for testing, as well, and are working on a review. Its effective speed is 83 which is currently only exceeded by AMD's 20% more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money. Problem with dfi infinity ultra a+ sound ?.. If you're planning on overclocking, you'll definitely want the extra heat-transfer ability gained from using a good liquid cooler. Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2017. Appreciable improvements with multi-core software. Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 875K vs FX 8370. Share this page. Testing AMD's FX refresh CPUs, the FX 8370 and FX 8370E will involve running it and its comparison products through OCC's test suite of benchmarks, which include both synthetic benchmarks and real-world applications. There are also 15 Vishera parts, that work in the same socket. FX-8370 ajunge la 8.7 GHz August 30, 2014 AMDNici nu a ajuns inca pe piata, si procesorul FX-8370, varful de gama desktop de la AMD, a fost luat la o tura de overclocking extrem. It easily outpaced the similarly priced Intel Core i5-4570. That really leaves the 125-watt FX-8370, while by no means a bad chip, as the odd chip out, unless it sees a price drop. It did, but it still lagged well behind even the Core i3-4130. Note that the FX-9590 did somewhat better here, but only when we strapped it to a Deepcool Gamer Storm Maelstrom 240 liquid cooler after getting subpar results with a single-fan watercooler. FX-8370 with stock fan. - Duration: 10:57. 5.0 out of 5 stars Can't get any better unless it's ryzen. To get fully stable at this speed required more voltage than the Corsair H100i could shed before throttling the clock speed. FX 8370. Platform. Čip dá dohromady 8 jader a patřičný výkon pro rychlý chod počítače přinese frekvence 4 GHz.Ve větší zátěži se automaticky přetaktuje na 4,3 … (The FX-9000 series chips practically require one, so you'll have to supply your own with those chips. Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). In the newest version of Cinebench, the new FX-8370 performed similarly. Air cooling is going to lower your overclocking margin just due to the heat these chips will shed when overvolted. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking. AMD FX-8370E - Benchmark and Specs compare with other CPU Cinebench R15 (Single-Core) Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. The gaming tests will also consist of both synthetic benchmarks and actual gameplay, in which we can see if similarly prepared setups offer any performance advantages. Search. We'll see the same dynamic in our next test. FX-8370. ), While we're happy to see AMD launch new chips in the neglected FX line, the AMD FX-8370 is much less a new chip than it is the slightest possible speed bump over a chip that's been around for two years. We have a great online selection at the lowest prices with Fast & Free shipping on many items! And those who really care about power efficiency, and who don't often run media-crunching or -creation apps, will be better off with a midrange Haswell-based Intel chip, like the Core i5-4460, or the 54-watt-TDP Core i3-4360. With its 4GHz core clock speed, which can step up to 4.3GHz automatically when all cores aren't being taxed, the FX-8370 is a reasonably good performer for the price when it's running software that can take full advantage of all eight cores. GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs. Because of those pauses, the AMD chips don't get quite the advantage of allowing their extra cores to chew through a continuous, time-consuming workload. (Stay tuned for our full review of the FX-8370E, but you can see our testing numbers for that chip in advance on the following pages.). We compare the specs of the AMD FX 8370 to see how it stacks up against its competitors including the AMD FX 8350, Intel Core i5 4690K and AMD FX 8370E. FX-8370 ... ©2020 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Footer Secondary. And you'll still need to be using a motherboard with a 900-Series chipset and the same AM3+ socket with these CPUs. 플랫폼. Two FX-9000 chips rolled out to modest fanfare in 2013, in the form of a top-end FX-9590 and a step-down FX-9370 variant. The 8370 can handle a pair of 1866, but with 2 pairs you have to set it at 1600 Mhz. It was launched in September 2014 and is both cheaper and faster than the FX-8350. This is very simple, one Piledriver module basically has two logical AMD64 CPU cores tied together. The AMD FX-8370 is a Socket AM3+ processor, based on Vishera core. The company also made several older models more affordable. As a result, using the Handbrake app we've switched to a much more taxing (and time-consuming) video-crunching test using 4K video as the source material. Using the "All CPUs" setting, we ran the POV Ray 3.7 benchmark, which challenges all available cores to render a complex photo-realistic image using ray tracing. PCMag Digital Group. In this test, we updated to the latest revision of Handbrake (version 0.9.9, the 64-bit version) and tasked the CPUs to convert a 12-minute-and-14-second 4K .MOV file (Tears of Steel) into a 1080p MPEG-4 video. There was just one high-performance blip on the AMD FX radar between then and now: the brief flare of the FX-9000-series processors.

Plau Am See Unternehmungen, Uni Ulm Mail, Schmitt Peterslahr Wikipedia, Alles Gute Zum 1 Monatigen Baby, Ndr Plattdeutsch Wettbewerb, öz Urfa Neugraben öffnungszeiten,

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

*

code