kritik der reinen vernunft

[27] Others see the argument as based upon the question of whether synthetic a priori judgments are possible. Rational Theology—God. It follows that the categories feature as necessary components in any possible experience. What things are in themselves as being noumenal, independent of our cognition, remains limited by what is known through phenomenal experience. Time and space cannot thus be regarded as existing in themselves. This is the step to criticism. Kant, with only minor modifications, accepts and adopts their work as correct and complete, and lays out all the logical forms of judgment in a table, reduced under four heads: Under each head, there corresponds three logical forms of judgement:[41], This Aristotelian method for classifying judgments is the basis for his own twelve corresponding concepts of the understanding. This ground of all experience is the self-consciousness of the experiencing subject, and the constitution of the subject is such that all thought is rule-governed in accordance with the categories. The world must have been caused by an intelligent power. The main sections of the Analytic of Principles are the Schematism, Axioms of Intuition, Anticipations of Perception, Analogies of Experience, Postulates and follow the same recurring tabular form: In the 2nd edition, these sections are followed by a section titled the Refutation of Idealism. The metaphysical expositions of space and time are concerned with clarifying how those intuitions are known independently of experience. Dialectical strife leads to an increase of reason's knowledge. Knowledge does not depend so much on the object of knowledge as on the capacity of the knower.[16]. Do that which will make you deserve happiness; What may I hope? In the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, the task at hand becomes the Refutation of Idealism. 69 . With regard to these essential interests of human nature, the highest philosophy can achieve no more than the guidance, which belongs to the pure understanding. Kritik der reinen Vernunft Edited by: Benno Erdmann. In deriving these concepts, he reasons roughly as follows. Search. It is a mistake that is the result of the first paralogism. Or, are they merely relations or determinations of things, such, however, as would equally belong to these things in themselves, though they should never become objects of intuition; or, are they such as belong only to the form of intuition, and consequently to the subjective constitution of the mind, without which these predicates of time and space could not be attached to any object? Each category has a schema. Seine 1893 verfasste Doktorarbeit trägt den Titel Der Entwicklungsgang der Kantischen Ethik bis zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft on Amazon.com.au. Another way of thinking of reason is to say that it searches for the 'unconditioned'; Kant had shown in the Second Analogy that every empirical event has a cause, and thus each event is conditioned by something antecedent to it, which itself has its own condition, and so forth. Die Geschichte der reinen Vernunft . Zweite hin und wieder verbesserte Auflage (1787) - Philosophie - Klassiker 2009 - ebook 0,- € - GRIN Met de Kritik der reinen Vernunft wilde Kant de grote filosofische tegenstelling uit zijn tijd te boven komen: aan de ene kant de empiristen zoals Hume en aan de andere kant de rationalisten zoals Descartes. According to Kant, the transcendental ego—the "Transcendental Unity of Apperception"—is similarly unknowable. B. nach dem Anfang des Universums oder der Existenz Gottes), deren Erkenntnis sich ihnen jedoch entzieht. Search all files. Then, the existence of all objects of outer sense is doubtful. Philosophische Bibliothek 505. However, upon closer examination of the subject, Hume discovered that some judgments thought to be analytic, especially those related to cause and effect, were actually synthetic (i.e., no analysis of the subject will reveal the predicate). Prior to Kant, it was thought that all a priori knowledge must be analytic. [75], Christian Gottlieb Selle, an empiricist critic of Kant influenced by Locke to whom Kant had sent one of the complimentary copies of the Critique of Pure Reason, was disappointed by the work, considering it a reversion to rationalism and scholasticism, and began a polemical campaign against Kant, arguing against the possibility of all a priori knowledge. Unlike Descartes who believes that the soul may be known directly through reason, Kant asserts that no such thing is possible. [32][a] "The Paralogisms of Pure Reason" is the only chapter of the Dialectic that Kant rewrote for the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. [50], In order to have coherent thoughts, I must have an "I" that is not changing and that thinks the changing thoughts. Anthony Giddens and his Critics (edit. Sometimes, the fourth paralogism is taken as one of the most awkward of Kant's invented tetrads. Such dogmatic assertions can't be proved. Edition Holzinger. Vorrede [A] 32 . Are they real existences? The world appears, in the way that it appears, as a mental phenomenon. [49], The only use or advantage of asserting that the soul is simple is to differentiate it from matter and therefore prove that it is immortal, but the substratum of matter may also be simple. Amazon.com: kritik der reinen vernunft. One may argue, for instance, according to the method of Descartes, and say that the conception of God could have originated only with the divine being himself, therefore the idea possessed by us is based on the prior existence of God himself. Das Buch "Kritik der Urteilskraft" ist Immanuel Kants drittes Hauptwerk nach der Kritik der reinen Vernunft und der Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, erschienen 1790. Kritik der reinen Vernunft This edition was published in 1979 by VMA Verlag in Wiesbaden :D. The remainder of the Critique of Pure Reason is devoted to examining whether and how knowledge of synthetic a priori propositions is possible. The physico-theological proof of God's existence is supposed to be based on a posteriori sensed experience of nature and not on mere a priori abstract concepts. The attack is mislocated. Others, who use the scientific method, are either dogmatists (Wolff]) or skeptics (Hume). This is not less true of pure thoughts, than of any others. 28 [Zueignung] 29 . Erkenntnis 51, 357–363 (1999). We can hope to be happy as far as we have made ourselves deserving of it through our conduct. Menschen denken - darin un­ter­schei­den sie sich von den Tieren. When, accordingly, the Ontological proof declares that the latter is involved in the former, it puts forward nothing more than a mere statement. In contradistinction, Kant holds that external objects may be directly perceived and that such experience is a necessary presupposition of self-consciousness. [citation needed], The Critique of Pure Reason was the first of Kant's works to become famous. Philosophy cannot possess dogmatic certainty. The Transcendental Analytic is divided into an Analytic of Concepts and an Analytic of Principles, as well as a third section concerned with the distinction between phenomena and noumena. 68 . Philosophische Bibliothek 505. "[25] An exposition on a priori intuitions is an analysis of the intentional constitution of sensibility. Search. [57], Pure reason mistakenly goes beyond its relation to possible experience when it concludes that there is a Being who is the most real thing (ens realissimum) conceivable. Immanuel Kant : Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Ausgabe B von 1887, Seite 37-58) Der transzendentalen Ästhetik Erster Abschnitt Von dem Raume §2 Metaphysische Erörterung dieses Begriffs. It is undeniable from Kant's point of view that in Transcendental Philosophy, the difference of things as they appear and things as they are is a major philosophical discovery. Kant further elaborates on the distinction between "analytic" and "synthetic" judgments. The reason of this is that it is not given to us to observe our own mind with any other intuition than that of inner sense; and that it is yet precisely in the mind that the secret of the source of our sensibility is located. For this, we need something absolutely necessary that consequently has all-embracing reality, but this is the Cosmological Proof, which concludes that an all-encompassing real Being has absolutely necessary existence. Product Type. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help. [REVIEW] Peter McLaughlin - 1999 - Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):2-3. Author. This is held to be proof per saltum. 1 year ago. Hardcover. Kant, however, argues that our knowledge of mathematics, of the first principles of natural science, and of metaphysics, is both a priori and synthetic. De to øvrige er Kritik af den praktiske fornuft (om praktisk filosofi og etik) og Kritik af dømmekraften (blandt andet om æstetik. Kant contrasts the transcendental ego to the empirical ego, the active individual self subject to immediate introspection. Yet moral reason can provide positive knowledge. This implies that the self in itself could never be known. Transcendental imagination is described in the first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason but Kant omits it from the second edition of 1787.[15]. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. [48][verification needed]. "[10], Kant decided to find an answer and spent at least twelve years thinking about the subject. Thus, since this information cannot be obtained from analytic reasoning, it must be obtained through synthetic reasoning, i.e., a synthesis of concepts (in this case two and straightness) with the pure (a priori) intuition of space. Immanuel Kant Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Aristotle's imperfection is apparent from his inclusion of "some modes of pure sensibility (quando, ubi, situs, also prius, simul), also an empirical concept (motus), none of which can belong to this genealogical register of the understanding. The concept Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant) represents the subject, aboutness, idea or notion of resources found in Boston University Libraries. 106. DOWNLOAD PDF. on October 10, 2008, There are no reviews yet. 3787313192 - Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft Philosophische Bibliothek German Edition by Kant, Immanuel. However, if these pure concepts are to be applied to intuition, they must have content. In the "Transcendental Aesthetic" he argues that space and time are pure forms of intuition inherent in our faculty of sense. Viewed by scholars of... Free Shipping on all orders over $10. More information on Archive.org About the BookReader | Report a problem . Uploaded by Things as they are "in themselves"—the thing in itself, or das Ding an sich—are unknowable. Being, as Kant thinks, actually increases the concept itself in such a way as to transform it. [54], These Paralogisms cannot be proven for speculative reason and therefore can give no certain knowledge about the Soul. Pistorius argued that, if Kant were consistent, his form of idealism would not be an improvement over that of Berkeley, and that Kant's philosophy contains internal contradictions. "[20] The above stems from the fact that "there are two stems of human cognition…namely sensibility and understanding. Kant proposes instead a critique of pure reason by means of which the limitations of reason are clearly established and the field of knowledge is circumscribed by experience. They result in four kinds of opposing assertions, each of which is logically valid. Kant's view of space and time rejects both the space and time of Aristotelian physics and the space and time of Newtonian physics. The idea of ten dollars is different from the fact only in reality. It was therefore thought that the law of contradiction is sufficient to establish all a priori knowledge.[9]. According to Kant, the most important part of this proposition is that a multi-faceted presentation requires a single subject. For Kant, an antinomy is a pair of faultless arguments in favor of opposite conclusions. The idea of a transcendental logic is that of a logic that gives an account of the origins of our knowledge as well as its relationship to objects. "[24], This division, as the critique notes, comes "closer to the language and the sense of the ancients, among whom the division of cognition into αισθητα και νοητα is very well known. I. Idee der Transzendental-Philosophie . The argument is essentially deductive in nature. (Philos) to express flustri runder Stein/Kiesel inostrani derivat partaking Aaronic full-time Is Not ah pokeren zmar a duce casă bună cu cineva (vom Feind) angegriffen weden (u.E.) Social Theory of Modern Societies. You Searched For: ISBN: 3787313192. Kant, who was brought up under the auspices of rationalism, was deeply disturbed by Hume's skepticism. (A599) Also, we cannot accept a mere concept or mental idea as being a real, external thing or object. We cannot know the world as a thing-in-itself, that is, other than as an appearance within us. Vollständiger, durchgesehener Neusatz mit einer Biographie des Autors bearbeitet und eingerichtet von Michael Holzinger. Similarly, they are not known to us independently of such consciousness or of sensible experience. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, first edition, in German. Kant introduces a whole set of new ideas called "concepts of reflection": identity/difference, agreement/opposition, inner/outer and matter/form. But the logical forms of judgement are by themselves abstract and contentless. Add Comment. Herausgegeben von Jens Timmermann. From $266.00. Die transzendentale Ästhetik 1. "[23] from this, "a science of all principles of a priori sensibility [is called] the transcendental aesthetic. Book Excerpt. EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) Want more? Kant defines transcendental idealism: I understand by the transcendental idealism of all appearances the doctrine that they are all together to be regarded as mere representations and not things in themselves, and accordingly that time and space are only sensible forms of our intuition, but not determinations given for themselves or conditions of objects as things in themselves. "[7] It is a "matter of life and death" to metaphysics and to human reason, Kant argues, that the grounds of this kind of knowledge be explained.[7]. If we are to possess pure concepts of the understanding, they must relate to the logical forms of judgement. The fourth paralogism is passed over lightly or not treated at all by commentators. Kant regards the former "as mere representations and not as things in themselves", and the latter as "only sensible forms of our intuition, but not determinations given for themselves or conditions of objects as things in themselves". Not in Library. The category has meaning only when applied to phenomena. Einleitung. Account & Lists Account Returns & Orders. You may also like. Edit Your Search. It determines the rights of reason in general. Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804,Adickes, Erich, 1866-1928. "Kant tells us that David Hume awakened him from his dogmatic slumbers. Kant distinguishes between the matter and the form of appearances. Kant explains skeptical idealism by developing a syllogism called "The Fourth Paralogism of the Ideality of Outer Relation:". Book Excerpt. [63], Discipline is the restraint, through caution and self-examination, that prevents philosophical pure reason from applying itself beyond the limits of possible sensual experience. 107. We are not in a position to say that the idea of God includes existence, because it is of the very nature of ideas not to include existence. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, Edited by Jens Timmermann, Felix Meiner Verlag Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Translated by Werner S. Pluhar with an Introduction by Patricia W. Kitcher, Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Tran. As categories they are not contingent states or images of sensuous consciousness, and hence not to be thence derived. Kant therefore attempts to extract from each of the logical forms of judgement a concept which relates to intuition. Hello, Sign in. The problem that Hume identified was that basic principles such as causality cannot be derived from sense experience only: experience shows only that one event regularly succeeds another, not that it is caused by it. The Logic is divided into two parts: the Transcendental Analytic and the Transcendental Dialectic. Kritik der reinen Vernunft von Immanuel Kant Professor in Koenigsberg, der Koenigl. If there were no promises the fulfillment of which was to be expected, 'lying' would indeed be a universal law of action, and by Kant's own criterion lying would now be moral, and it would be truth that would be immoral.[81]. Die Disziplin der … In this case, however, it was not experience that furnished the third term; otherwise, the necessary and universal character of geometry would be lost. The implication is that premise and conclusion stand over against one another without any obvious, much less necessary, connection. [20] In it, what is aimed at is "pure intuition and the mere form of appearances, which is the only thing that sensibility can make available a priori. The Doctrine of Elements sets out the a priori products of the mind, and the correct and incorrect use of these presentations. In the Transcendental Logic, there is a section (titled The Refutation of Idealism) that is intended to free Kant's doctrine from any vestiges of subjective idealism, which would either doubt or deny the existence of external objects (B274-79). Eintheilung der … That is the concept of a Supreme Being who has maximum reality. (A278/B334), Following the systematic treatment of a priori knowledge given in the transcendental analytic, the transcendental dialectic seeks to dissect dialectical illusions. $15.11. The Transcendental Dialectic Kant calls a "logic of illusion";[38] in it he aims to expose the illusions that we create when we attempt to apply reason beyond the limits of experience. Also referred to as Kant's "First Critique", it was followed by the Critique of Practical Reason (1788) and the Critique of Judgment (1790). The only ground for knowledge is the intuition, the basis of sense experience. In a letter to Kant, the philosopher Christian Garve admitted to having written the review, which he disowned due to editorial changes outside his control. Kant's investigations in the Transcendental Logic lead him to conclude that the understanding and reason can only legitimately be applied to things as they appear phenomenally to us in experience. Morals, analytics and dialectics for Kant constitute metaphysics, which is philosophy and the highest achievement of human reason.[71]. Immanuel Kant Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 106. Locke, however, said that the existence of God and the immortality of the soul could be proven. In order for humans to behave properly, they can suppose that the soul is an imperishable substance, it is indestructibly simple, it stays the same forever, and it is separate from the decaying material world. Some would even go so far as to interpret the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason as a return to the Cartesian epistemological tradition and a search for truth through certainty. Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies from Benevolent Motives, Arthur Schopenhauer's criticism of Immanuel Kant's schemata, G.J. Die Kritik der reinen Vernunft (KrV; im Original Critik der reinen Vernunft) ist das erkenntnistheoretische Hauptwerk des Philosophen Immanuel Kant, in dem er den Grundriss für seine Transzendentalphilosophie liefert. The first review appeared in the Zugaben zu den Göttinger gelehrte Anzeigen in 1782. The Ontological Argument starts with a mere mental concept of a perfect God and tries to end with a real, existing God. While Kant claimed that phenomena depend upon the conditions of sensibility, space and time, and on the synthesizing activity of the mind manifested in the rule-based structuring of perceptions into a world of objects, this thesis is not equivalent to mind-dependence in the sense of Berkeley's idealism. It has no objective validity. I. Idee der Transscendental-Philosophie 17 II. This paralogism misinterprets the metaphysical oneness of the subject by interpreting the unity of apperception as being indivisible and the soul simple as a result. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or Search WorldCat. II. These special concepts just help to make comparisons between concepts judging them either different or the same, compatible or incompatible. Nach der 1. und 2. [11] Although the Critique of Pure Reason was set down in written form in just four to five months, while Kant was also lecturing and teaching, the work is a summation of the development of Kant's philosophy throughout that twelve-year period.[12]. They exist for us only in relation to each other. The dogmatic use of reason is called into question by the skeptical use of reason but skepticism does not present a permanent state for human reason. These questions are translated by the canon of pure reason into two criteria: What ought I to do? USA Today July 13 2016. One of the ways that pure reason erroneously tries to operate beyond the limits of possible experience is when it thinks that there is an immortal Soul in every person. The logical subject is a mere idea, not a real substance. Not in Library. Both answers maintain that space and time exist independently of the subject's awareness. Einleitung [nach Ausgabe A] 69 . The Ideas of Rational Cosmology are dialectical. These schemata are needed to link the pure category to sensed phenomenal appearances because the categories are, as Kant says, heterogeneous with sense intuition. [14], Kant writes: "Since, then, the receptivity of the subject, its capacity to be affected by objects, must necessarily precede all intuitions of these objects, it can readily be understood how the form of all appearances can be given prior to all actual perceptions, and so exist in the mind a priori" (A26/B42). It is apperception as the principle of unity in the consciousness continuum that dictates the presence of "I" as a singular logical subject of all the representations of a single consciousness. [70], All knowledge from pure reason is architectonic in that it is a systematic unity. "[29]:206 As Kant states: "Through observation and analysis of appearances we penetrate to nature's inner recesses, and no one can say how far this knowledge may in time extend. In pure philosophy, reason is morally (practically) concerned with what ought to be done if the will is free, if there is a God, and if there is a future world. You can also read the full text online using our ereader. In Kant's view, all of the above methods are faulty. [79] The constructive aspect of the work, Kant's attempt to ground the conditions for the possibility of objects in the conditions of experience, helped bring about the development of German idealism. Kritik der reinen Vernunft: Text der Ausgabe 1781 1900, Atlas-Verlag in German / Deutsch zzzz. Kant's view is that in explaining the movement of celestial bodies Copernicus rejected the idea that the movement is in the stars and accepted it as a part of the spectator. Immanuel Kant. If geometry does not serve this pure a priori intuition, it is empirical, and would be an experimental science, but geometry does not proceed by measurements—it proceeds by demonstrations. 2010. [66], The canon of pure reason is a discipline for the limitation of pure reason. Kants "Kritik der reinen Vernunft" gilt vielen als Höhepunkt der abendländischen Philosophie - andere halten sie schlicht für unlesbar. Volltext von »Kritik der reinen Vernunft«. The content which the pure conceptions, as categories of pure physical science or sensible knowledge, cannot derive from the matter of sense, they must and do derive from its pure form. "[22] This in itself is an explication of the "pure form of sensible intuitions in general [that] is to be encountered in the mind a priori. The Analytic Kant calls a "logic of truth";[37] in it he aims to discover these pure concepts which are the conditions of all thought, and are thus what makes knowledge possible. worksintranslation, americana. Yet the cosmological argument treats it as if it were an object of knowledge exactly on the same level as perception of any thing or object in the course of experience. Kant uses the classical example of 7 + 5 = 12. This personified object is postulated by Reason as the subject of all predicates, the sum total of all reality. E-Book. Logicians prior to Kant had concerned themselves to classify the various possible logical forms of judgment. This is the great vice of the Ontological argument. Is there a future life? It was concluded early that good conduct would result in happiness in another world as arranged by God. [67], The speculative propositions of God, immortal soul, and free will have no cognitive use but are valuable to our moral interest. Kritik der reinen Vernunft… In section II, the discipline of pure reason in polemics, Kant argues strongly against the polemical use of pure reason. "[21] It is thus an analytic of the a priori constitution of sensibility; through which "Objects are therefore given to us…, and it alone affords us intuitions. Try Given a certain fact, it proceeds to infer another from it. By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. We cannot know, through reason, anything that can't be a possible sense experience; ("that all our knowledge begins with experience there can be no doubt"). In concluding that there is no polemical use of pure reason, Kant also concludes there is no skeptical use of pure reason. [36] Knowledge, Kant argued, contains two components: intuitions, through which an object is given to us in sensibility, and concepts, through which an object is thought in understanding. [74], Kant believed that the anonymous review was biased and deliberately misunderstood his views. (Zur Wahl dieser Fassung vgl. It was not Kant but the monk Gaunilo and later the Scholastic Thomas Aquinas who first challenged the success of the proof. Was steht drin, in diesem Text des großen Aufklärers? For Kant, all post-Cartesian metaphysics is mistaken from its very beginning: the empiricists are mistaken because they assert that it is not possible to go beyond experience and the dogmatists are mistaken because they assert that it is possible to go beyond experience through theoretical reason. [64], Restraint should be exercised in the polemical use of pure reason. II. The other part of the Transcendental Aesthetic argues that time is a pure a priori intuition that renders mathematics possible. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. All three proofs can be reduced to the Ontological Proof, which tried to make an objective reality out of a subjective concept. The fitness of this arrangement could never have occurred randomly, without purpose. [65], Proofs of transcendental propositions about pure reason (God, soul, free will, causality, simplicity) must first prove whether the concept is valid. That whose existence can be inferred only as a cause of given perceptions has only a doubtful existence. Yet we cannot prove that there is a permanent soul or an undying "I" that constitutes my person. Auflage book. 107. David Hume at first accepted the general view of rationalism about a priori knowledge. Bausteine Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kritik der Reinen Vernunft Kants. Beiser writes that many sections of the Critique of Practical Reason are "disguised polemics against Pistorius". If we try to know an object as being other than an appearance, it can only be known as a phenomenal appearance, never otherwise. If only Hume would be critical rather than skeptical, Kant would be all-praises. Nach der 1. und 2. Originalausgabe herausgegeben von Jens Timmermann. What should I do? The theologian Johann Augustus Eberhard began to publish the Philosophisches Magazin, which was dedicated to defending Wolff's philosophy. In the same way the conception of God is different from the fact of his existence only in reality. The relation of sensibility to an object and what the transcendental ground of this [objective] unity may be, are matters undoubtedly so deeply concealed that we, who after all know even ourselves only through inner sense and therefore as appearance, can never be justified in treating sensibility as being a suitable instrument of investigation for discovering anything save always still other appearances – eager as we yet are to explore their non-sensible cause." 1900, G. Reimer in German / Deutsch - 5., durchgängig rev. Buch. [52] In the first edition, Kant refutes the Cartesian doctrine that there is direct knowledge of inner states only and that knowledge of the external world is exclusively by inference. The central problem of the Critique is therefore to answer the question: "How are synthetic a priori judgements possible? In Book II, chapter II, section III of the Transcendental Analytic, right under "The Postulates of Empirical Thought", Kant adds his well-known "Widerlegung des Idealismus" (Refutation of Idealism) where he refutes both Descartes' problematic idealism and Berkeley's dogmatic idealism. 0 (0 Reviews) Free Download. Kant further divides the Doctrine of Elements into the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Logic, reflecting his basic distinction between sensibility and the understanding. Many titles have been used by different authors in reference or as a tribute to Kant's main Critique, or his other, less famous books using the same basic concept, Critique of Practical Reason and Critique of Judgment. Then the soul may decay, as does matter. Hannah Arendt and Jean-François Lyotard dealt with its work of orientation of a limited understanding in the field of world history.

Anderes Wort Für Rassismus, Yvonne Catterfeld Tochter, Abgabe Bis 24 Uhr, Wetter Sturmtief Kirsten, Alma Tübingen Exmatrikulation, Pension Lohr Am Main, Vorlesungsplan Dhbw Stuttgart, Veranstaltungen Mannheim Kinder,

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

*

code